Supreme Court May Strike Down Affirmative Action

If the conservative Roberts Court is true to form, the affirmative action programs that have been used by the nation’s top universities for a generation could be in danger when the U.S. Supreme Court returns in the fall.

The Obama administration is fighting to keep affirmative action alive, joined by a diverse and wide-ranging coterie of supporters, from a group of 50 major corporations that includes Microsoft and Wal-Mart to a coalition of retired military leaders that include former Secretary of State Colin Powell.

At issue is the affirmative action program at the University of Texas, which is being challenged by a white woman, Abigail Noel Fisher, who says she was the victim of racial discrimination, in violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, when she was rejected by the University of Texas. The court arguments are scheduled for Oct. 10, while a decision isn’t expected until the first half of 2013.

The administration is using a somewhat novel defense of affirmative action, making it a matter of national security. In a 35-page brief, the administration said the military, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Homeland Security all rely on universities to produce a steady stream of diverse graduates.

“The United States has a critical interest in ensuring that educational institutions are able to provide the educational benefits of diversity,” U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued in a brief signed by officials in six federal departments, including the Pentagon.

Considering race in admissions decisions was endorsed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1978 Bakke decision and reaffirmed by the court in the 2003 Grutter V. Bollinger decision. But considering that five of the nine justices appear ready to strike down race-based decision-making, many observers feel affirmative action may be in jeopardy.

The companies who filed briefs in support of the University of Texas said they “must be able to hire highly trained employees of all races, religions, cultures and economic backgrounds.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top