Aurora Shooter Possibly Preparing for Insanity Defense

The lawyers for James Holmes, the man accused of killing 12 people and injuring 58 others at an Aurora movie theater, said in a court hearing today that Holmes is mentally ill.

Observers believe his lawyers are building a case for him to use the insanity strategy as a defense against the 124 criminal counts he faces—including 24 counts of first degree murder.

“By alluding to Holmes’ mental problems, it’s clear the defense is sowing the seeds for a defense of not guilty by reason of insanity,” Denver defense attorney Scott Robinson told NBC News.

Just as he did in July, Holmes looked dazed when he appeared in court today—clearly not in the same mental space as the man who burst into the movie theater shortly after the beginning of the midnight showing and proceeded to mow down dozens.

Lawyers for the media are also making a claim that the media be allowed to have access to court records that currently are under seal.

The media’s 85-page motion argues that the public has “an obvious and legitimate interest” in actions being taken by government officials in the case.

“This status quo violates the public’s constitutional right of access to the records of criminal prosecutions and undermines our nation’s firm commitment to the transparency and public accountability of the criminal justice system,” the document argues.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top