Billionaire Tries To Board Plane with $1 Million Cash

Most airline passengers hate being told to check their carry-on luggage for various reasons, mostly because people would rather have valuables such as laptops and iPads with them on the plane instead of being tossed around by baggage handlers below.

South African billionaire Christo Wiese had a much bigger problem, as he now faces a legal fight to regain $1 million confiscated by customs officials in London because of his method of transporting the cash.

According to Forbes, Wiese, South Africa’s third-richest person, was traveling from England to Luxembourg in 2009 with the cash bundled up in rubber bands in his luggage. The billionaire tried to board the aircraft with one of his suitcases stuffed with the cash he says was the result of diamond deals in South Africa in the late 80’s and 90’s.

The UK justice system seized the money under suspicion that it was the booty from  a crime, given the secretive mode of transportation.

Wiese’s lawyer scoffed at any notion of foul play, saying, “The amount of money was consistent with Dr. Wiese’s stated wealth, representing less than two weeks’ income and a minute fraction of his assets.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top