British Officials Call In The Big Guns For Olympics

Every four years the host of the Summer Olympic games has to develop a security plan for the thousands of visitors planning to pile into the host country. This year’s host, London, England, has a plan straight out of a James Bond film.

Spy planes, helicopters with snipers, the biggest warship in the Royal Navy’s fleet, state-of-the-art radar systems/security cameras, and don’t forget the surface-to-air missiles on the rooftops of civilian apartment buildings.

“This is the biggest sporting event in the world, and with that comes the huge responsibility to deliver it safely and securely,” British government’s minister for crime and security James Brokenshire said in a statement obtained by the latimes.com. “It will require a big operation from the U.K. police, supported by the military.”

That “big” operation will consist of 13,500 ground troops backed by more than 20,000 guards, with an extra 9,500 police officers on peak days.

But many residents have a problem with this plan, claiming it will turn London into a militarized zone of sorts.

“What happens if the missiles become a target and terrorist try to take the tower block out by exploding them?” asked Flash Bristow, chairwoman of a nearby residents association. “The trouble is that we just don’t know what’s going on. All that people have got is their imagination.”

Let’s not forget the hefty price tag. Security alone is at $875 million. The soaring cost of security has pushed the overall Olympic budget from under $4 billion to $15 billion during hard economic times in Europe.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top