Jonathan Vilma Walks Out Of Hearing With Roger Goodell

On Monday, the NFL began hearing the appeals of Jonathan Vilma, Will Smith, Scott Fujita and Anthony Hargrove. But an hour into the process, three players expressed their disenchantment with the way things were handled, and Vilma walked out.

Vilma and his attorney Peter Ginsberg cut the linebacker’s appeal short after just about an hour and emerged from the NFL headquarters, calling the process a “sham,” according to CBS Sports.

“We got upstairs and the Commissioner has tried to regroup by adjourning today’s hearing after we presented our position with regard to the process and with regard to the merits,” Ginsberg said. “We’re not willing to participate in that kind of sham.

“The Commissioner had legal obligations and procedural obligations. He failed in those obligations and as far as we’re concerned these proceedings are over.”

According to Ginsberg, it was he and Vilma who decided to shut down the appeals process — the league attempted to adjourn for the day but Vilma and Ginsberge weren’t interested.

“He attempted to adjourn it and we closed the record,” Ginsberg said. “The hearing is over as far as we’re concerned.”

Asked whether or not he believed Vilma could return to hear more on the appeal later, Ginsberg said that Vilma’s attempts to win in the NFL’s venue for appeals — with the Commissioner — were over.

“For more abuse of the process and more abuse of Jonathan’s rights? No, we’ve decided enough is enough,” Ginsberg said.

Vilma’s attorney made it quite clear, without explicitly saying so, that moving the venue to an actual courtroom was entirely a possibility moving forward. Vilma himself said that Goodell’s decision and the NFL’s procedure tarnished his reputation and that he felt unable to “get a fair process.”

“Roger Goodell has taken three months to tarnish what I built over eight years in my career and it’s tough to swallow that from here on out no matter where I go, I’ll be linked to a BountyGate that’s simply not true,” Vilma said. “Everyone has their opinions on it and everyone will either believe me or not believe me. There’s no in between. It’s unfortunate that this process has been the way it is, and the situation has been the way it is because at the end, it’s just not true.”

“I don’t know how you get a fair process when you get [Roger Goodell as] judge, jury and executioner.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top