Sen. McCain Blasts Supreme Court, Big Money Political Contributions

Sen. John McCain stood up against the Republican party line by stating that the U.S. Supreme Court made a mistake in allowing corporations to contribute unlimited amounts of money to political campaigns.

McCain has long been an opponent of excessive campaign cash, even when he was running against President Obama in 2008. He co-sponsored the McCain-Feingold Act a decade ago to limit campaign contributions, but that act was never followed—and it was rendered irrelevant by the Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case, which stated that corporations had the same rights as individuals.

“That’s why we have different laws that govern corporations than govern individual citizens and so to say that corporations are people, again, flies in the face of all the traditional Supreme Court decisions that we have made — that have been made in the past,” McCain said in an interview on PBS with Judy Woodruff.

McCain’s statements were in response to news that Las Vegas billionaire Sheldon Adelson donated $10 million to a Mitt Romney SuperPAC, Restore Our Future, which reportedly spent $41 million during the Republican primary season.

Adelson got most of his profits from gambling properties in Macau, a gambling city in China that’s larger than Las Vegas, leading McCain to conclude that  “in a round-about way” what we have is foreign money” coming into an American campaign, political campaigns.

But other Senate Republicans were still out there, towing the party line, like Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell. McConnell defended the court’s Citizens United decision on Friday, and then made the almost ludicrous claim that Obama administration was intimidating the billionaire Koch brothers and other wealthy Republican donors.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top