‘Prometheus’ Opens Strong, Takes Page from ‘Alien’

Past science-fiction efforts from director Ridley Scott have been described as nothing short of prolific, delivering cult classics like Alien and Blade Runner. As a result, his first true return to science fiction since the mid-80s has garnered tremendous attention. Scott’s new film Prometheus, which made $21.4 million in its Friday night opening (beating Madagascar 3 by just a million) has been billed as a loose prequel to the Alien franchise, and the setting again returns to the isolation of space.

The title alone reveals the premise of the film, in which a human space crew seeks to discover the origin of mankind. For fans of the original Alien flick, Prometheus retains a similar atmosphere, spending the start of the film centering in on the isolation of the ship’s crew. Noomi Rapace stars in the role of scientist Elizabeth Shaw, supported by a cast including Charlize Theron, Idris Elba and up-and-coming star Michael Fassbender.

On a distant moon known only as LV-223, the crew encounters the ruins of what they believe was an outpost for humanity’s alien ancestors. Much like in Alien, the crew comes across an unknown substance, which triggers the fast paced action seen in the trailers. Despite Scott’s attempts to distance Prometheus from the Alien franchise in pre-release promotions, Prometheus has drawn mixed reviews due to constant comparisons to the 1979 film and its use of vague storytelling.

Without revealing too much of the plot, Prometheus both meets and disappoints expectations. Elements of the film that would have been breathtaking in Scott’s older series have become cliché in present-day cinema. Still, strong special effects and genuinely interesting themes will make the movie a satisfying watch for most theater-goers.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top