Mark Zuckerberg Sued For Unloading Facebook Stock Before Price Collapse

Facebook investors are having Mark Zuckerberg sued for insider trading. Investors were furious when Zuckerberg allegedly sold $1 billion worth in Facebook stocks just before the stock tanked. The stock was overvalued at $38 per share, and Zuckerberg allegedly knew a flaw existed in the stock’s valuation. Those having Zuckerberg sued are small non-institutional investors.

Only a week after the $38 share value and initial public offering (IPO) was released last month, the stock plummeted to $32 a share. Zuckerberg’s unloading of the stock upon the knowledge that he would experience his own substantial losses is what angered Facebook investors to cause them to urge having Zuckerberg sued.

The first lawsuit to Facebook last month was after only large investment companies off Wall Street, such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley, had proper notice of the predicted drop. The small investors who were not in the know experienced a $2.5 billion drop in stocks after the IPO was released, a primary reason for having Zuckerberg sued.

Mary Schapiro, the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said, “There is a lot of reason to have confidence in our markets and the integrity of how they operate, but there are issues we need to look at specifically with regard to Facebook.”

According to Business Insider, Facebook investors are not the first to have Zuckerberg sued. In July 2010, Paul Ceglia had Zuckerberg sued because their deal to split Facebook ownership was discarded. This was in spite of the $2,000 Ceglia allegedly paid Zuckerberg for half of the ownership.

Zuckerberg was already searching for new ways to earn ad revenue when the number of Facebook Mobile users rose, and the number of ads on the home page dropped. The screen is smaller, so there is less room to show ads, and Zuckerberg did not want to create an obnoxious pop-up. Because ad revenue became low with the increased number of Facebook Mobile users, there was not enough money to support the $38 stock estimate. This lack of information is what caused people to want to have Zuckerberg sued.

Although he strived to make precautions tailored to the predicted drop, Zuckerberg still lost 25% of his profits.

According to The Washington Post, Wall Street aims to maintain good morale with institutional investors. One method to do so is to price a company lower than its worth, so when it experiences a sudden increase while trading, it “pops.”

source: collegenews.com

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top