Get Ready for DOT.LOL Website Addresses

As the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) works to expand the Internet’s infrastructure, thousands of companies are trying to get in on the ground floor. Google has been one of the biggest names looking to gain control of new generic top-level domains (gTLDs), the suffix portion of website addresses like “.com.”

A year ago, ICANN approved a plan that would allow for individual companies to propose and apply for new gTLDs, to be approved by the organization for use online. Google announced the gTLDs they applied for via a blog post on Thursday—a list that included: .google, .docs, .youtube and .lol. Vint Cerf, the author of that blog post, was the former chairman of ICANN’s board of directors.

In the eyes of supporters, personalized gTLDs would allow for company and brand specific marketing. For example, bigbangtheory.cbs or howimetyourmother.cbs would provide easily identifiable official websites for fans of those CBS comedies. Sites with a different ending would be equally identified as fakes. Detractors argue that the new designations could create confusion for online users. A homepage of cbs.cbs would be unnecessarily repetitive. At a cost of $185,000 per domain application, companies must decide on their own if they’re ready to pursue their own domains. Continued maintenance of those domains could cost hundreds of thousands or even millions each year.

ICANN originally planned to publish the full list of applicants on April 30th, but system glitches pushed back the application deadline to May 30th. A full list of the proposed gTLDs will be announced next month.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top