Tiger Not Sharp But Still In Contention At The Memorial

Tied for the lead early in his round Saturday at the Memorial, Tiger Woods did not hold it together, making bogey on two of the last three holes to shoot a 1-over-par 73. That leaves him four shots behind leader Spencer Levin, but at Muirfield Village, that hardly is an insurmountable advantage.

The little-known Spencer shot a 3-under 69 (minus-8 for the tournament) and holds a one shot lead over Rory Sabbatini. They will represent the final group in Sunday’s deciding round, which likely will be played under windy conditions.

However, it stands to reason much of the attention, however, will be placed on the group in front of them: Woods and young hotshot Ricky Fowler, who shot 69 Saturday.

”Four shots is definitely manageable around this golf course, considering the conditions and what they’re going to be tomorrow,” Woods said. ”A lot of guys are still in this ballgame. It’ll be an exciting day.”

It will help Woods if he puts better than Saturday. On the closing holes he missed a three-putt from 20 feet on the 16th for bogey, a 10-footer for birdie on the 17th and another 10-footer for par on the closing hole.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top