'Snow White And The Huntsmen' Ripped By Top Critics

Universal’s Snow White and the Huntsman hits theaters this weekend. The film stars Kristen Stewart, Charlize Theron and Chris Hemsworth. Still, before potential movie goers waste their hard earned cash on movie tickets, salty popcorn, and flat soda – they may want to read what the top movie critics are saying about the film.

The Wrap’s Alonso Duralde said Stewart’s Snow White, “is too reminiscent of her twitchy Twilight character Bella Swann and would have a hard time convincing people to follow her to Forever 21, let alone storm a castle.”

“The screenwriters should have taken a page from the 1997’s film Ever After, in which Drew Barrymore’s Snow actually had a thought in her head and some plausible skill with a sword,” said Jeff Meyers of Metrotimes

Bob Bloom from Jconline coldly says “‘Snow White’s’ biggest drawback is Stewart. She is beautiful in an ethereal manner suggesting that she is the epitome of purity. She looks the part, but the illusion is shattered whenever she opens her mouth.”

Elizabeth Weitzman from the NY Daily News said, “Hemsworth is especially well cast as the would-be prince, a charismatic hero with some intriguingly rough edges. But it’s Theron who owns this film, imbuing her deliciously depraved Queen with furious pain and deep-seated fear.”

The film received 46% on the Rotten Tomato meter from critics, and a 74% score from the audience. Consider yourself informed.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top