Spurs Having It Easy With The Lifeless Clippers

Tony Parker is dominating Chris Paul.

It is not much of a surprise that the San Antonio Spurs are up 2-0 in their Western Conference semifinals series against the Los Angeles Clippers. But to dominate L.A. with such ease, well, not many expected such dominance.

Thursday night’s 105-88 conquest was almost a repeat of San Antonio’s Game 1 manhandling of the Clippers. The Lob City of the regular season and even the first round of the playoffs is nowhere to be found. The Spurs’ sound and discipline play has offset Los Angeles’ athleticism in a resounding fashion.

All-star guard Chris Paul of the Clippers has been totally ineffective, scoring but 10 points Thursday after fai Blake Griffin (20 points), the team’s catalyst with his power dunks, has had a power outage. And no one else with L.A. has done enough to even draw concern from the Spurs.

Tony Parker grossly outplayed Paul, scoring 22 points on his 30th birthday, TIm Duncan 18 as San Antonio stretched its winning streak to 16. Maybe going home for Game 3 Saturday will help the Clips.

It certainly would help of Paul showed up. The All-Star matchup against Parker was boring Game 1 and lopsided Thursday (Paul had eight turnovers).

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top