Federal Panel Recommends 1st Ever Home HIV Test

A panel of experts took a look at the first rapid over-the-counter HIV test this week and they came away impressed by what they saw. The test would allow Americans to give themselves a test for the HIV virus that causes AIDS. Making the test more readily available to the public may encourage people to immediately know their status and also to pick safer sex partners.

In a unanimous vote on the test, called OraQuick, 17 members of the Food and Drug Administration advisory panel said they believe the benefits of the home test greatly outweigh any risks that have been observed so far. Although the test will not be quite as accurate as professionally administered tests, it is still quite a useful tool for consumers. The test will require the user to get a mouth swab and should produce results in about twenty minutes.

The company behind OraQuick is OraSure, based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, which already has sold several versions of the home test in the past to doctors. The government has already approved other H.I.V home tests, but these required blood samples and had to be sent to a laboratory—not nearly as convenient as OraQuick.

OraSure is hopeful that the product will be on the market this year, but the F.D.A has still not made its decision whether to approve. Statistics show that 1.1 million people are infected with HIV and, unfortunately, more than 230,000 don’t know it, according to OraSure. They hope that placing such a convenient method of testing on the market will reduce risky behavior by those infected with the virus and lead to a decrease in the numbers.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top