Some Continue to be Surprised by the Black Ability to Separate Politics from Religion

Pundits predicted a maelstrom of negative reactions from the black community to President Obama’s recent change of heart on the issue of the right of gay couples to marry. Instead, there has been barely a strong breeze against him.

Mainstream media has dispatched reporters across the country, polling every preacher with a pulpit and barber with a pole, to find some major undercurrent of opposition and have instead found a calm current of general acceptance.

Perhaps, if they understood that black folks have long had to deal with the subtleties of ideals versus realities, then it would be less of a seeming contradiction to those outside of the community.

Sexual preference and piety have been tacitly dealt with for some time in the church without ostracism, but with acceptance of the individual regardless of codified policy. The gay choir director is a stereotype that in many instances had some basis in fact, but it was never a stereotype portrayed with hatred or vitriol, simply a humorous observation of the complexity of even what is supposed to be black and white. Black folks have accepted for quite some time that on most issues, there are lots of shades of gray.

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top