NFL Concussion Defendants Rise by Another 100

Former Falcon Jamal Anderson

Yet another lawsuit regarding concussions was filed against the NFL in Atlanta on Thursday, carrying the names of more than 100 former players, including former Falcons Jamal Anderson and O.J. Santiago, among others.

These players join more than 1,500 others who allege that the league intentionally deceived players as to the dangers of concussions, and knowingly did not take steps to protect players from head injuries.

In the wake of the New Orleans bounty program scandal and the NFL’s continued attempts to crack down on illegal hits, the players’ lawsuit appears to be gaining momentum. The league continues to deny misleading players in any fashion, and maintains that the safety of the players is a priority. The NFL has taken steps in recent years to increase the amount of caution used when a player is believed to have suffered a head injury. This includes more vigorous testing both on the field immediately after the injury, and before a player can be cleared to play in the next game.

The players’ claims are backed by scientific studies, which link concussions to a degenerative brain disease that produces symptoms similar to Alzheimer’s. The disease, called chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), can only be caused by repeated blows to the head, and unfortunately can only be diagnosed post-mortem. The suit claims that a dozen cases of CTE have been diagnosed in dead NFL players.

However, even with evidence of long-term brain trauma as a result of a professional career, the players may struggle to prove that the NFL intentionally withheld knowledge of the long-term dangers. Commissioner Roger Goodell has made it clear that player safety is a priority under his regime, but the players from ages past have been living with the results of a rougher time in the league.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top