Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Entertainment
EntertainmentNews

Liam Hemsworth And Miley Cyrus Engagement Rumors Debunked!

Posted byBy ABS Contributor | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

As if  Liam Hemsworth needed anymore attention after all the buzz surrounding the success of Hunger Games,  the actor is getting even more press because of a tweet by singer and actress Miley Cyrus.

After Cyrus, his girlfriend of three years, tweeted a picture of her manicured hand last Thursday — blinged out with a large diamond ring — rumors spawned that the 22 year old actor was preparing to walk down the aisle with his teenage beau.

The couple was spotted Saturday night at Muhammad Ali’s Celebrity Fight Night XIII event in Arizona, where Cyrus again sported the giant sparkler, sparking more engagement rumor chatter.

 

 

However,  Hemsworth and Cyrus are not engaged, according to  a source close to the “Hannah Montana” star.

In fact, Miley debunked the rumor on her Twitter account Monday claiming the ring is a topaz stone. The actress wrote, “I’m not engaged. I’ve worn this same ring on this finger since November! People just wanna find something to tal(k) about! It’s a topaz people!”

Liam and Cyrus have dated since sharing the big screen in their 2009 film The Last Song.  The couple split in August 2010, but reconciled a few months later.

Why do you think Miley Cyrus tweeted a photo of her ‘topaz ring’ on her wedding finger? Perhaps, she just wanted to help Liam Hemsworth out a little by boosting his buzz level for the  Hunger Games release.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top