Katy Perry Denies Taking A Swipe At Beyonce Knowles' Music

Rihanna once said there’s a pact: It’s me, Gaga, Katy Perry, Beyonce.’ To date, Beyonce Knowles has completed one duet with Lady Gaga and zero with Rihanna and Katy Perry. While the ladies dominate pop music, along with others not mentioned we’re guessing it doesn’t mean they have to like each others music.

The ‘Part of Me’ singer confirmed plans to musically collaborate with Rihanna,

“We’ve collaborated on a lot of things, but just not songs yet,” said Perry during a BBC Radio 1 interview. “It’s one of those things that’s got so much build up that we have to deliver.”

But she was sure to clarify who and what sound they weren’t going for.

“I want it to be like that Eurythmics and Aretha Franklin song ‘Sisters Are Doin’ It for Themselves.’ “Not ‘Beautiful Liar.'”

Beautiful Liar, Beyonce’s 2007 hit with Shakira. Of course Katy could be referring to her preference for a woman empowerment song with a feminist twist rather than women coming together after being scorned by love. But surely she knew this would stir the pot…and stirring the pot is good for business. Still the California Gurls is putting a lot of pressure on a duet that hasn’t gotten further than just an idea.

“How disappointed would you be if that song came out and it’s no good? Sometimes you have to wait for greatness.”

In an update: Perry has issued her denial…via Twitter of course.

“F*ck all y’all . . . dat thinks I dissed anyone, puhlez,” Perry, 27 Tweeted on Wednesday. “Get a life, cuz it’s not mine! #hoodratcominout. If ya ears are filled with wax it’s time to get a cleanse boo. Anywayz . . . (steps off box).”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top