'Shame' Director Steve McQueen Claims Americans Fear Of Sex Caused Oscar Snub

Oscar nominations have been made, and it appears the Academy overlooked Michael Fassbender for a nomination for best actor. For the fans that place Fassbender on the same tier as George Clooney and Brad Pitt, this was a shameful disappointment.

Steve McQueen, the director of Shame, strongly believes the British actor’s performance was ignored by the Academy because of Oscar voters’ biases about sex. The acclaimed director exclaimed:

“In America they’re too scared of sex, that’s why he wasn’t nominated, If you look at the best actor list you’re saying ‘Michael Fassbender is not on that list?’ It’s kind of crazy. But that’s how it is, it’s an American award, let them have it.”

Shame depicts Fassbender’s character, Brandon, as a sex addict. Brandon indulges in his addiction until his private life is disrupted by his sister, Sissy, who  arrives at his door unannounced for an indefinite stay.

McQueen raved about Fassbender’s performance saying, “He’s a once in a generation actor. He’s an actor who can transform and transcend, and you actually believe him, so that’s the kind of guy he is.”

When asked about how he felt about being nominated for best actor, Fassbender had this to say about his nude undertaking:

“We moved very fast. We shot it in 25 days, so I kind of had to get over it and get on with it.”  When asked about the possibility of an Oscar nomination he said, “It would just be a bonus, but of course I would take my mom down the red carpet.”

Not only was Fassbender passed over by Brad Pitt, Gary Oldman, Jean Dujardin, George Clooney and Demian Bichir  for the best actor prize, Steve McQueen’s Shame was absent from all categories for this year’s Academy Awards.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top