Chris Brown Slapped With GQ's Worst Dressed Man Award

Chris Brown the worst dressed man? GQ named the ‘Yeah 3x’ singer its Worst Dressed Man of 2012. The Best Dressed honor went to UK rapper Tinie Tempah with other like Robert Pattinson, Christian Bale and Idris Elba on the list.

Brown who’s slated to perform at this years Grammy for the first time in three years received some harsh criticism from the popular men’s magazine,

“For someone who seems to have so much disposable income – he boasts on one track about spending “15 grand on a phone” and charged over $500 for meet-and-greets on his last tour – Brown seems utterly adverse to investing in tailoring, combining the worst excesses of XXL sizing with a penchant for deeply unflattering costumes. Sorry “Team Breezy”, but you may have to look away now…”

It’s important to note that GQ is no fan of Chris after the comment last year on their Facebook page,

A fan asked whether he (Brown) would ever grace the cover: Might be a while. It is a Gentlemen’s Quarterly, after all, not ironically-Named-Magazine-That-Knowingly-Puts-Domestic-Abusers-On-Its-Cover Quarterly

You be the judge – Check out a few Chris Brown pictures below – does he deserve this honor?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top