'Red Tails' Soars Above Hollywood's Expectations

“Red Tails” rose above Hollywood’s expectation on its opening weekend with a very respectable $19.1 million debut. The $58 million George Lucas’ passion-movie, starring Terrence Howard and Cuba Gooding Jr., captured second place behind “Underworld Awakening 3D”.

The strong debut of the Tuskegee Airmen film put it above other comparable fighter pilot movies such as Stealth ($13.3 million), Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow ($15.6 million), and Flyboys ($6 million).

“Red Tails” drew a mature and nearly even male and female audience with a 51 percent male/66 percent 25 years and older breakdown. The movie received an “A” CinemaScore, which improved to a fantastic “A+” score for those below 18 and above 50. Another interesting feat to note about Red Tails is that it brought distributor 20th Century Fox its best opening for a non-franchise title since last April’s “Rio”.

A few weeks ago, Red Tail’s high-flying numbers seemed very unlikely. But leading up to release, the film gained great momentum, especially on the web.

George Lucas previously has accused Hollywood studios of refusing to back his Red Tails project because of its all-black cast. Lucas gambled on the film with $53 million of his own money and so far it looks like he made a good bet.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top