Serena Williams To Blame For Common And Drake’s Rap Beef?

Serena Williams is being blamed for sparking the first rap beef of 2012 between veteran rapper Common and newbie Drake. It wouldn’t be the first time a beautiful woman has come between good men. Rapper Common and Drake are engaged in a back and fourth that began when Common dropped a few lines geared towards Drake in ‘Sweet’.

“Y’all soft motherf—kers, singing all around me man, la la la/ You ain’t motherf—kin’ Frank Sinatra/Uh, lil’ b*tch…Sweet Ass Muthaf*cker”

Earlier this week Drake responded while dropping a verse on ‘Stay Schemin’ from Rick Ross’ new mixtape ‘Rich Forever’.

“Back when if a nigga reached it was for the weapon/Nowadays niggas reach just to sell their record.”

Oh did we forget to mention Common recently dropped his ninth studio album ‘The Dreamer/The Believer’? But when was the last time Common sparked controversy to sell a few more albums?? Here’s where Serena comes in.

Serena and Common dated for nearly three years before ending their relationship in 2010. Last year Drake was spotted getting close to Serena during the US Open. In a an interview with Complex, Drake gushed about his love for Serena,

“I really, really love and care for Serena Williams,” he said. “She’s definitely in my life and I’m in her life.”

Common who revealed he wasn’t quite over Serena when he rapped about their relationship in ‘Love Lost’ from his latest album, may have been rubbed the wrong way by the Drake and Serena’s relationship.

What do you think – is Serena to blame for this rap beef?

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top