Tobey Maguire Decides To Fold His Hand In Illegal Poker Lawsuit

Tobey Maguire has settled a lawsuit which accuses him of winning more than $300,000 in stolen money from currently jailed Beverly Hills hedge-fund manager, Brad Ruderman, as part of an illegal poker ring operation.

The Hollywood star has decided to pay $80,000 in restitution in order to be dropped from ongoing investigations.

The initial lawsuit was filed in a federal Bankruptcy Court in California back in March. A trustee for the victimized investors filed the suit, while on a mission to get back the money the actor had won in several private high stakes Texas Hold ‘Em gatherings held by Ruderman.

The con-man is currently serving a 10-year sentence after being convicted of investment fraud and wire fraud. Ruderman was accused of assembling a Ponzi scheme that stole more than $25 million in investor funds to pay off his poker debts.

Money that Maguire won in the poker games was schemed gains that Ruderman embezzled from his clients. The movie star claims that he had no knowledge of where Ruderman got the funds.

The trustee accepted Maguire’s 80 grand settlement instead of going through the lengthy court process.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top