Marion Bartoli Takes Out Wimbledon Defending Champion Serena Williams

OK – so that title is not completely fair to Serena Williams. Yes, she is the defending champion but the last time Serena played on a tennis court was less than one month ago since that Wimbledon title in 2010.

Marion Bartoli put Serena on the edge – serving two more aces than Serena! Bartoli who’s never won against Serena until today did lose to Venus at the Wimbledon final in 2007 – revenge was sweet.

Beating Serena is almost like a dream come true,” Bartoli said. “Even though she didn’t play for almost one year, she’s probably one of the greatest champions in women’s tennis.

Sister, Venus Williams was also ousted in straight sets. This leaves the next favorite Maria Sharapova ready to reclaim her second Wimbledon title after beating Serena in 2004.

Coming into the Grand Slam, Serena and Venus were considered the heavy favorites over players who played year round. It was a sting to the tennis community that the Williams can come back after a year off and still be considered the favorites?? The pundits proved to be wrong….unfortunately. World no. 1 Caroline Wozniacki is also out. So will take the slam?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top