Cadbury Chocolate Upsets Naomi Campbell With Milk Bliss Bar Ad

Cadbury chocolate has “shocked” and upset supermodel Naomi Campbell over their Milk Bliss bar ad. The model who is known for her stunning looks as much as she is for her recent diva antics wasn’t fond of Cadbury comparing her to chocolate. Cadbury carefully only referred to Campbell by her first name in the ad that read; “Move over Naomi, there’s a new diva in town.” But it appears Naomi is well aware of her current image and has assumed the ad refers to her.

According to The Independent, Naomi stated,

“I am shocked. It’s upsetting to be described as chocolate, not just for me, but for all black women and black people. I do not find any humor in this. It is insulting and hurtful.”

Valerie Morris, Naomi’s mother added, “I’m deeply upset by this racist advert. Do these people think they can insult black people and we just take it? This is the 21st century, not the 1950s. Shame on Cadbury.”

Cadbury has since confirmed the ads have been removed, adding,

“We would never produce any type of marketing we felt might cause any offense to any section of society.”

Is Namoi Campbell’s outrage warranted or misdirected?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top