Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Editor's Picks
Editor's PicksHistoryList

6 Arguments That Prove The First Man Was Black

Posted byBy A Moore | Published on: | Updated on September 8, 2017 CommentsComments (22)

The recent African origin of modern humans, frequently dubbed the “Out of Africa” theory, is the most widely accepted model describing mankind’s geographic origin and early migration. The theory asserts that humans first evolved in Africa, and most of man’s time on earth has been on that continent.

Here are six reasons why scientists believe humans originated in Africa and why they have abandoned the notion we evolved separately and independently in different parts of the world.

homo sapiens idaltu

Nature Doesn’t Strike Twice

There exists two theories of human origin: monogenism and polygenism. The monogenic view, which today is referred to as the “out of Africa theory,”  states that there is one source for mankind; man was born in one place but evolved differently due to the climatic conditions to which he was exposed.

The polygenic theory, or multiregional origin of modern humans,  claims that man has several locations of origin, which would explain the physiological differences between the races. Followers of this theory believe that man was born in Africa, Europe and Asia, and there was no evolutionary or climatic development.

World renowned historian, anthropologist, and physicist Dr. Cheikh Anta Diop states one important reason why the polygenic theory is faulty is that Mother Nature never strikes twice; she doesn’t create the same being twice.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top