5 Examples of US Government Efforts to Destabilize Black Nations

CIA cuba

Jamaica

In the lead-up to the 1980 elections, Jamaica was embroiled in four years of bloodshed. The sitting Prime Minister Michael Manley headed the “progressive” People’s National Party (PNP) while Edward Seaga headed the “reactionary” Jamaica Labour Party (JLP). Manley had openly criticized American foreign policies and began to build a relationship with U.S. enemy Cuban leader Fidel Castro. Given the Cold War the United States was involved in with Russia, the CIA did not want Jamaica to be friendly with communists.

According to Gary Webb’s book,”The Dark Alliance,” Norman Descoteaux, the CIA station chief in Jamaica began a destabilization program of the Manley government in the late ’70s. Part of that plan was assassinations, money for the Jamaican Labour Party, labor unrest, bribery and shipping weapons to Manley’s opponents, like Lester “Jim Brown” Coke. Coke was a political enforcer and bodyguard to Seaga.

According to a 2010 article on newsone.com, former CIA agent, Philip Agee, said the “CIA was using the JLP as its instrument in the campaign against the Michael Manley government, I’d say most of the violence was coming from the JLP, and behind them was the CIA in terms of getting weapons in and getting money in.”

There was reportedly an assassination attempt on the late legendary singer Bob Marley’s life funded by the CIA. Writer Timothy White speculates, in his biography of Marley, “Catch A Fire,” that Jim Brown was part of a team of armed gunmen led by JLP enforcer Carl “Byah” Mitchell that attempted to assassinate Marley.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top