‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’: First Official Photo Of Jamie Foxx as Electro

As Marc Webb’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2 prepares to swing back into theaters, Entertainment Weekly has released a cover photo featuring Andrew Garfield as your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man and Jamie Foxx as the lightning bolt-throwing villain Electro.

Up until now, the best images we had of Jamie Foxx as Electro were from spy photos snapped during on-location production shoots in Manhattan. Those photos showed Foxx under a hood, with the glowing face characteristic of his post-Electro conversion.

The Comic-Con inspired EW cover shot is the first official Electro photo. In it, we see Foxx’s Electro facing off against Garfield’s wall-crawler.

The details of what happens in this sequel are heavily guarded, but the EW cover suggests Electro actually is the main villain of Webb’s Amazing Spider-Man 2.

We’ve seen actor Paul Giamatti filming scenes as The Rhino and we know that Chris Cooper has been cast as Norman Osborn aka The Green Goblin, so we know Spider-Man will be grappling with more than one formidable foe.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2, will be released in 2D and 3D in U.S. theaters on May 2, 2014.

Check out the first official photo of Jamie Foxx as Electro below.

 

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top