Tensions Rise in Maxine Waters Ethics Case

Members of the House Ethics Committee raised tensions even further with California Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters and her supporters, by denying a request to release the findings of a special counsel’s investigation of Waters. The request, which was put forward by Waters and dozens of other House Democrats, was rejected via letter just a day after being submitted.

All 10 members of the committee’s panel signed the letter, which said that the request made incorrect assertions about her case, several of which had been previously addressed. The committee maintains that special counsel Billy Martin has never issued a formal written report of his findings, and that his role in the investigation is on going. The refusal letter stated that there “is no justification for releasing the confidential details of staff advice to the Committee at this time.”

Waters has been under investigation for nearly three years, and the flat denial of the request suggests that the committee is building a strong case against her. The 11-term representative is facing accusations that she improperly sought federal assistance for OneUnitedBank in 2008, a minority-owned bank in which her husband held a financial interest. The bank received $12 million in bailout funding.

The congresswoman is determined to prove that the ethics committee’s investigation impeded on her personal rights, and that the bank efforts were part of a larger movement to help stabilize minority-controlled banks during the recession. Waters’s claims that the length of the investigation alone is a violation of her right to a speedy and public trial, and some of her defenders believe the committee’s actions are racially motivated.

“Considering that it was the conduct of the Committee that necessitated Mr. Martin’s investigation in the first place, which came at the cost of up to $800,000 to the U.S. taxpayer, we feel it is absolutely essential that the Committee move forward with absolute transparency and release Mr. Martin’s report,” the request released by Democrats supporting Waters stated.

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi prompted the start of the investigation in 2008 when it was referred to the Office of Congressional Ethics, a nonpartisan group. The House Ethics Committee took on the case in summer 2009.

 

 

 

 

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top