‘You Better Not Hit Him!’: Women Rush to Defend Elderly Black Man After Asian Beauty Supply Worker Chases Him with Metal Grabber Over Theft Accusation

People on social media are saying a Los Angeles beauty supply store went overboard while escorting out an elderly Black customer whom they suspected of stealing.

In an August Instagram video posted by FiguerouaFacts, an Asian shop owner wields a metal grabber as he shouts and curses outside his Compton-area storefront, accusing the older man of theft.

Suddenly, another employee grabbed the man’s plastic shopping bag and, in a tug-of-war, dragged him back into the store.

Asian beauty supply workers chase down an elderly Black man, accusing him of theft. (Photo: Instagram screenshot/ FiguerouaFacts)

The bag ripped, spilling the contents across the floor, as employees began picking up the items. But the man and a good Samaritan who stepped in said he stole none of the products, and none came from the store.

“That sh-t ain’t even yours,” a woman shouted at the employees.

Addressing the man, she said, “Get your stuff and make sure they don’t hit you. C’mon, because they better not hit you with an [expletive] thing.”

‘Robbed of Their Youth’: Black Siblings Kept Locked Away as Slaves by White Adoptive Parents Reach $4.4M Settlement After State Failed to Intervene

The woman kept warning the employees to back off as he struggled to gather his belongings. He eventually left and asked the woman if she wanted something from his bag as a thank-you.

Many commenters online speculated that he was a street peddler who had been caught trying to steal a wig from the shop, pointing to a moment in the scuffle when he said, “I gave you your wig back.” But those claims are unsubstantiated.

Even if the store had reason to be suspicious, the way things played out struck a nerve with many viewers. Chasing someone out with a metal pole in hand and yanking his bag apart isn’t exactly how most people expect an employee to handle suspected shoplifting.

California lets shop owners briefly detain a suspected thief, but only with good reason and without using more force than necessary. Brandishing a metal pole and ripping a man’s bag apart over a mere suspicion is hard to defend.

On Atlanta Black Star’s official Instagram, commenters urged shoppers to boycott the store and always “Buy Black!!!!” in a rallying cry to support Black-owned businesses.

At least one person suggested going a step further: “Shoulda called the police on them for assault. That’s insane. Stop giving these places your business.”

People also heaped praise on those who came to the man’s aid.

One fan enthused: “I love how the Queens stepped [in] for the old man.”

Another agreed: “Thank you for sticking up for him, even if he’s wrong, they not right.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top