‘Quote the President … Go to Jail’: Man Who Posted Meme Using Trump’s Exact Words Is Held on $2M Bond After Claim It Was ‘Threat of Mass Violence’

A Tennessee man was jailed on a $2 million bond after being accused of inciting violence by posting memes of President Donald Trump and slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk in a Facebook group where members were organizing a vigil for Kirk.

According to The Tennessean, 61-year-old Larry Bushart, Jr. was charged with threats of mass violence on school property and activities after posting the images in the Perry County community group, where a local vigil for Kirk was being arranged.

Tennessee Man Larry Bushart is still behind bars after posting meme. (Credit: Tennessee Sherrif’s Office)

One of the memes is an image of Trump with a direct quote from the president that reads, “We have to get over it.”

The president made that statement after a school shooting in January 2024 in Perry, Iowa, that claimed the life of one person and injured seven others.

Bushart, a former police officer, also captioned his post with, “This seems relevant today.”

Members of the Facebook group thought otherwise and reported Bushart under the ostensible assumption that he was making threats against Perry County High School, where last year’s mass shooting took place.

‘Dishonesty Here is Remarkable’: JD Vance Denies Charlie Kirk’s Racist Attack on Prominent Black Women — But Video Evidence Blows It Up

“This led teachers, parents and students to conclude he was talking about a hypothetical shooting at our school,” Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems said, adding that “numerous” people reached out to local authorities “in concern.”

Weems continued, “Investigators believe Bushart was fully aware of the fear his post would cause and intentionally sought to create hysteria within the community.”

The meme Bushart used has been posted countless times across social media since January 2024, typically in anti-Trump advertisements or by gun violence prevention activists.

In the weeks since Kirk’s death, people have reported being fired or suspended from their jobs for critical posts about Kirk.

Bushart is one of the first to face criminal charges for his unsympathetic post about the commentator. His bond was set at $2 million, according to local reports.

Some argued that authorities went too far and that his arrest represents an infringement of his First Amendment rights. However, police maintain that his post represented threatening speech and charged him under a state law passed in July 2024 that makes it a Class E felony to make threats against schools.

That law has reportedly faced intense scrutiny for blanket language that could conflict with Supreme Court precedent set in the 2023 Counterman v. Colorado ruling, according to The Tennessean.

The court determined that a “true threat,” which refers to threatening language not protected by the First Amendment, requires proof that the speaker consciously disregarded a “substantial risk” that their speech would trigger fear or harm others. The ruling states that the recklessness of the speech must be assessed by the speaker’s awareness of the risk, and not the listener’s perception of the threat.

“Creating mass hysteria in our community will not be tolerated,” Weems said, per WSMV. “We will continue to act quickly and decisively to protect our students and our citizens.”

“However, much offense it caused, there’s no serious argument it was a threat. It’s hard to see the arrest and charges as anything but politically motivated.,” one Aaron Terr, Director of Public Advocacy with Fire.org. His colleague followed up with, “Quote the President of the United States, go to jail.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top