Romney Blasts Obama on Foreign Policy

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney offered up a speech yesterday critiquing President Obama’s foreign policy record, which most pundits—even some conservatives like New York Times columnist David Brooks—view as one of the biggest successes of the Obama administration.

Romney went after Obama’s handling of Iran’s nuclear threat, the violence in Syria and relations with Israel during a speech at the convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, a group that the president also addressed.

But perhaps indicating how much he feels that Obama’s foreign policy record isn’t as vulnerable as other areas of Obama’s tenure, such as the economy, Romney went in especially hard on a somewhat obscure “leak” that the Republicans claim the Obama White House slipped to reporters to make the president look strong and decisive on the killing of Osama bin Laden.

“This conduct is contemptible,” Romney said of the leaks of classified information. “It betrays our national interest. It compromises our men and women in the field. And it demands a full and prompt investigation by a special prosecutor, with explanation and consequence.”

Up until now, the leak accusations had come from Republicans in Congress, but now Romney is trotting them out to see if he can get any traction from them. This was the first time Romney brought any real passion to attacking the president on any foreign policy-related matters.

“What kind of White House would reveal classified material for political gain? I’ll tell you right now: Mine won’t,” Romney said.

Although U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed two federal prosecutors to investigate the leaks, Romney indicated that this wasn’t enough. But it’s probably all that the GOP will get on the issue, since the White House has rejected calls for a special prosecutor, saying there is no need for one.

During a news conference last month, Obama called the leak accusations “offensive” and “wrong.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top