Vitamin D Plus Calcium May help you live longer

Older people who take vitamin D with calcium may have lower death rates than those who don’t.

That finding comes from a new study, published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. It comes just days after an expert government panel reported that there is insufficient evidence to recommend calcium and vitamin D supplementation for older women.

The researchers analyzed findings from eight large vitamin D trials involving more than 70,000 older people.

People were followed for three years, on average. During that time, those who took vitamin D and calcium were less likely to die than people who did not.

The reason for the lower death rate isn’t clear. But it didn’t appear to be about a reduction in fractures, which is one main indication for taking calcium and vitamin D.

Vitamin D has been linked to a lower risk for colorectal cancers and several other cancers in some studies, but the research is far from conclusive.

“It seems that calcium with vitamin D has benefits for general health, but we need more studies to understand this association,” researcher Lars Rejnmark, PhD, of Denmark’s Aarhus University Hospital tells WebMD.

Read the rest of this story on WebMD.

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top