‘Are You a Sick Person?’: Trump Snaps at Reporter, Vance Piles On — Then It Backfires Spectacularly

Republican desperation as the midterms approach is palpable. Cracks are starting to show, especially among the party’s top two: President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance.

During an Oval Office event on Tuesday, Trump lashed out at a reporter who asked a simple question.

Trump and Vance unveiled a new whistleblower program that offers up to $30,000 for exposing government fraud and waste, news outlets reported.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance speaks (R) during an event with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on Oct. 20, 2026, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The White House correspondent for The Independent, Andrew Feinberg, first asked Trump why whistleblowers would use the new program when they could use an existing one.

The historic False Claims Act offers rewards significantly higher than what Trump and Vance are proposing, up to 25 percent more.

A confused Trump seemed unsure of the question and exploded at Feinberg.

“I don’t know who the hell you are, but you better be careful,” an angry Trump sneered as Vance jumped in calling the perfectly legitimate question “dishonest,” according to The Independent.

Feinberg responded to this part of the squabble on X, during the press conference.

“I had told him exactly who I was not five minutes before this exchange,” he wrote.

A little later, Feinberg tried to ask another question about the public golf course in Washington Trump has started overhauling without approval.

“What’s wrong with you? Are you a sick person?” the president of the United States asked a reporter who was just doing his job.

Feinberg responded, “Not at all, sir.”

“I actually think there’s something wrong with you,” a furious Trump whined, barely holding it together.

Feinberg clapped back at Vance on social media after the tense encounter.

Vance posted a clip of the exchange on X.

“President Donald J. Trump eviscerates imbecile ‘journalist’ Andrew Feinberg for misbehaving in the Oval Office: ‘What’s wrong with you? Are you a sick person? I actually think there’s something wrong with you,’” Vance mockingly attacked the journalist.

Feinberg responded, admonishing Vance.

“Mr. Vice President, if you’re going to insult me at least have the guts to tag my account,” he replied.

After Feinberg’s post, social media erupted with plenty of posters praising Feinberg for his guts.

“Whoa. A journalist with a spine,” an X user proclaimed.

Others agreed.

“Well done. The projection of the unhinged imbecility from that pair is off the charts.”

This commenter said what many were probably thinking: “That would imply that he has guts, period. He doesn’t.”

Feinberg even answered at least one MAGA X user critical over the exchange.

“Insult you? You’re a doosh bag. Not the way to behave I [in] the White House. I hope they never let you in there again.”

Feinberg was quick on his feet. “It’s spelled ‘douche,’” he responded.

It seems like Trump mocks and insults reporters every week, and has for the past two years since retaking office.

He’s known for attacking reporters, especially women, when he doesn’t like their questions.

The incidents between Trump and women journalists date back to his first run for office in 2015. He calls them names, dodges questions, gaslights them, yells, and basically throws tantrums when they press him on his statements and policy decisions.

In mid-August, he exploded on CNN’s Kristen Holmes. It happened after she asked about his decision to scale back joint military exercises with South Korea following praise for North Korea’s murderous communist dictator, telling her to be quiet and accusing her of “fake news.” He also threatened her children in a weird social media post

Later that month, he lashed out at PBS News’ Liz Landers after she pressed him on whether he planned to sanction Chinese banks in relation to Trump’s efforts at ending his unapproved and ongoing war against Iran.

He called another woman journalist “stupid” last month for asking questions he didn’t like. He’s commented on CNN’s Kaitlan Collins smile, saying she doesn’t smile enough.

He ordered Bloomberg News journalist Catherine Lucey to shut up last year, demanding, “Quiet, Piggy.”

He also unleashed a furious and deeply personal attack against New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman late last month. He called the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist a “stalker.” He mocked her appearance and accused her of fabricating a story that he pulled out of an appearance at Ground Zero in Manhattan on 9/11 because he couldn’t make a speech.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top