White Woman Unapologetically Hurls N-word at Black Driver After Allegedly Throwing Trash and Cutting Him, Then She Does the Unthinkable, Video Shows

A traffic dispute took an ugly turn when a white woman resorted to racial slurs and trash-throwing.

Jamie Reid, the intended target, said he was called the N-word multiple times on a roadway in Connecticut. The woman called 911, and police reportedly cited him to appear in court.

Reid filmed key parts of the exchange.

White Woman Unapologetically Hurls N-word at Black Driver After Allegedly Throwing Trash and Cutting Him, Then She Does the Unthinkable, Video Shows
Video stills show a woman who was involved in a road rage confrontation. (Photos: Instagram/thesidewalkschool2)

In the caption of his video, Reid claims the woman exploded because “she couldn’t wait for traffic and cut me off.”

In the comments on TikTok, where he posted the footage on October 6, he said he’s looking for “a good lawyer to take my case.” He did not go into detail about what his case would be.


White Man Storms Up to Black Woman Mid-Workout, Demands She Leave and Threatens to Call Police, Video Shows

Beloved San Diego Chef Hid in Plain Sight for 14 Years — Then One Tip Sent U.S. Marshals to His Restaurant

The dispute happened at the corner of Main Street and Beller Road in Watertown, a west-central Connecticut suburb that is 80 percent white (non-Hispanic) and 2.4 percent Black, according to the Census Bureau.

The video shows her swerving in front of his car to make a U-turn, as he presses her to admit to using the slur.

“Everybody wants you to shut the f*ck up. Get in your car and move,” she told Reid, who was standing outside of his vehicle filming. As she drove past him, she said, “You’re an unhinged n*gger, actually.”

But while Reid was loudly defending himself in the street, at least two drivers passing by yelled back. One said “bullsht” and another told him to “Shut the fck up!” The woman laughed and added, “Seriously.”

The woman also called the police, noting his New York license plate, saying she was afraid, and telling 911 that he threw a drink at her car. Reid accused her of throwing trash at his car first. Neither incident was caught on camera.

According to an Oct. 7 Instagram post by The Sidewalk School, a nonprofit humanitarian organization, the woman allegedly told police Reid threatened her life. “She even told cops I was going to kill her,” he told the group, adding, “But she was the one who got out of her car and walked toward me.”

Police reportedly cited Reid to appear in court. However, it’s unclear why they issued the citation.

After he shared the video on social media, many commenters urged him to buy a dash camera and not engage. Some saw a bigger problem with how police respond to white accusers:

“They weaponize the police, and if we don’t record them, the police will always give them the benefit of the doubt. No matter the situation or circumstance. The police will make us prove our innocence,” wrote one.

Other commenters were stunned by how quickly it turned racist. “The audacity. As a white woman, I cannot believe how people just throw this word around. It is so foul,” wrote a person on TikTok. Another got to the heart of the matter, asking, “Why do we constantly see people resort to race when in these situations?”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top