‘I’m a Victim of Prejudice’: Black Teen Arrested for Carjacking Despite School Alibi, Wore Ankle Monitor for 7 Months Until Reporter Questioned Case

Baltimore prosecutors kept an innocent 17-year-old Black high school student on house arrest for seven months with an ankle monitor after falsely accusing him of involvement in a violent crime

But Deryl Bright Jr., who scored the third-highest SAT score in his school last year, was at school that day – more than a half mile away from the actual crime.

Nevertheless, nobody in the legal system addressed the blunder until Baltimore Sun investigative reporter Kate Cimini asked prosecutors why the charges against him remained active.

‘I’m a Victim of Prejudice’: Black Student Had Top SAT Score and a School Alibi, But Police Still Arrested Him for Carjacking He Says He Didn’t Commit
Deryl Bright Jr. (right) spent seven months on house arrest with an ankle monitor after authorities falsely accused him of involvement in a carjacking, until Baltimore Sun investigative reporter Kati Cimini (left) began making inquiries. (Photo: linkedin.com/in/kaitlinscimini and facebook.com/baltimoresun)

The Baltimore State Attorney’s Office dismissed the charges the following day. Authorities removed the ankle monitor days later.

“I feel isolated,” Bright told Cimini days before the charges were dropped. “I feel unfairly punished for a crime I didn’t commit.”

While on house arrest, Bright could only go to school, work, and doctor’s appointments, but he told the reporter the violent nature of the alleged crime prevented him from continuing his job as a pharmacy technician.

‘He Dragged My Daughter!’: Sheriff Captain’s Son Charged in Crash That Killed 2 Black Residents, But His Day in Court Leaves Victims’ Families Furious

A judge also refused to allow him to attend his high school prom, a family reunion, or a Florida vacation his mother had planned as a graduation trip.

“It’s a repetitive cycle, over and over again, every day,” he said. “It just makes me feel lonely.”

Both the state attorney’s office and the public defender’s office blamed each other for the blunder. And Baltimore police blamed unnamed school officials who identified Bright from video surveillance.

However, two school officials confirmed to the Sun that Bright was in school during the time of the crime, indicating police did not bother to conduct a thorough investigation before arresting Bright.

The ordeal began on Jan. 23 after three Black teens inside a McDonald’s followed a man to his car to rob him shortly after 9 a.m.

Two teens covered their faces with hoodies, while the third left his face exposed. Investigators identified the third teen as Bright, even though they estimated him to be 6 inches shorter and heavier than Bright.

The teens assaulted the man, with one stealing his phone and wallet and running away, prompting the man to chase him. The other two attempted to steal the car, but the victim jumped on the hood, and the teens ran away.

Meanwhile, Bright was on his way to his first-period agriculture class at Green Street Academy, a public charter school that required students to wear uniforms. None of the three suspects were wearing a school uniform.

Police obtained witness statements and surveillance footage and began their investigation, eventually speaking to a school official who told them the unmasked teen was Bright.

Police arrested Bright at school about a month later, transporting him to the station where they collected blood and urine samples. Authorities eventually placed him on house arrest with an ankle monitor.

Meanwhile, there is no indication from the Sun article as to whether police arrested any of the real suspects.

“I feel like I’m a victim of prejudice,” he told Cimini. “They assume I was somebody I’m not.”

“It was just pure laziness on the account of the detectives that they didn’t put more time in investigating the whole case.”

Bright can have his case expunged, which would remove it from the public record, but only if he agrees not to sue. His family is therefore still weighing its options.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top