‘Inscrutable, Impenetrable Fury’: Jamie Raskin Shreds Trump’s Own Words to Expose His Unhinged Trade War on Canada, and It Gets Personal Fast

Rep. Jamie Raskin used one of his turns during the committee debate to dismantle the Trump administration’s trade war with Canada from the inside out.

The ranking member came to the House Judiciary Committee hearing on Sept. 16 with receipts.

The Maryland Democrat entered two articles into the record. The first, from Yahoo News dated March 11, 2025: “Trump Blasts His Own Trade Deal With Canada: Who Made These Decisions?”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, ranking Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary(Credit: ABS Screengrab)

The second, from Politico dated June 30, 2026: “Trump Now Hates His Own Trade Deal, But He’ll Have A Hard Time Killing It.”

Raskin said President Donald Trump negotiated most of the U.S. trade laws he now attacks during debate over the No Racketeers on Our Shores Act.

“He declared at the time, of course, the greatest trade deal ever signed,” Raskin said. “And now it’s the worst trade deal ever signed.”

‘So Unlikable’: JD Vance Begs Voters for Mercy After Heckler Left Him Speechless at Rally, Then the Internet Tears His Comeback to Shreds

He then turned to the relationship with Canada itself and what he called Trump’s “inscrutable, impenetrable fury” toward one of America’s closest partners.

“We don’t know where it comes from,” Raskin said. “Maybe he doesn’t like the prime minister for whatever reason. Maybe he thinks he’s getting too smart or is too good-looking or something. But in any event, he’s slapped 50 percent tariffs on the people of Canada.”

From there, Raskin turned to the relationship itself, rattling off numbers that painted a picture of how much damage Trump’s 50 percent tariffs on Canada could do.

Canada has been one of the U.S.’s top two trading partners for a decade, and it was also the top destination for U.S. exports in 2024 and the third-largest source of U.S. imports.

Raskin then noted that Canadians have begun boycotting American businesses in retaliation.

To continue proving his point, he explained the two countries have traded over $30 billion in U.S. agricultural products alone — cereals, pasta, fresh vegetables, ethanol — while Canada has sent back over $40 billion in farm goods along with energy products and automobiles.

“Donald Trump has thrown a monkey wrench into the whole thing,” Raskin said, “upsetting the apple cart that he built with Canada in his first term.”

Rather than examining whether the trade policy was actually hurting American workers, consumers, and businesses, Raskin said the administration instead chose to let Trump “personalize this,” even denying specific Canadian officials’ families visits to Disney World or Disneyland.

Raskin called the legislation — which Legis1 describes as a law “which would make certain foreign government officials who engage in economic discrimination against U.S. persons inadmissible or deportable” — an “insult and an affront both to the intelligence of the American people, as if we don’t understand what’s going on, but also to foreign countries.” Then he yielded back.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top