‘We Got This Wrong’: Target Pulls Halloween Costume After Viral Image Has Social Media Calling Out Racist Imagery Hiding in Plain Sight

Target has pulled a children’s Halloween costume from its website after social media users accused the retailer of selling a design that appeared to resemble racist blackface and minstrel imagery.

The costume, listed under the name “Kids’ Glows under Blacklight Circus Clown Halloween Costume Bodysuit,” was being sold for $25. Target identified Hyde and EEK! Boutique as the maker of the product.

The product image showed a Black child wearing a black-and-orange clown outfit alongside a face mask with an exaggerated, oversized grin. The child also posed for photos as if he were about to run or give someone a high-five.

Target was forced to pull a Halloween costume that appeared to look like racist imagery.
Target was forced to pull a Halloween costume that appeared to look like racist imagery. (Photo Credit: Threads/@tryannosaurus.valley)

The image quickly drew online comparisons to racist imagery associated with historical blackface and minstrel stereotypes.

History of Blackface Minstrel Performances

Blackface minstrelsy involved white performers using burnt cork or paint to darken their skin and adopting exaggerated facial features to mock African Americans.

Did Texas Roadhouse Employees Spit In Black Customers’ Food? What We Know About the Viral Post

Thomas Dartmouth Rice, a white performer often dubbed the “Father of Minstrelsy,” popularized the Jim Crow caricature through blackface performances in the 1830s.

Blackface performances became particularly popular after the Civil War and continued into the early 20th century, particularly in Northern and Midwestern cities.

Some social media users said the Target costume’s imagery was too similar to historical blackface caricatures to be ignored.

“Thanks Target! I will be using you as a reference to the ongoing racism in the United States when I teach Jim Crow this year. Teachers across the country now have primary source evidence of modern day racism,” @tyrannosaurus.valley commented on Threads.

The social media user also posted a picture of a man in blackface in a similar position to the child in Target’s product image.

“Someone made a child pose for this picture. I hope they are fired, shunned, and shamed,” another Threads user said.

‘I’ve Seen This Before’

The controversy drew comparisons to a 2018 incident involving H&M.

“H&M all over again,” a user wrote, adding a picture from a former H&M ad campaign.

In January 2018, H&M faced severe backlash and accusations of racism after featuring a Black child wearing a green hooded sweatshirt printed with the words “coolest monkey in the jungle.” Celebrities including The Weeknd and LeBron James criticized the brand.

The company pulled the image, apologized and stopped selling the item globally.

A Mountain of Backlash

Target has also faced criticism over its handling of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. The company became the subject of a nationwide boycott in 2025 after scaling back its DEI programs. The ultimately concluded in March 2026.

The latest controversy has prompted some social media users to question how the costume and its accompanying image made it through the company’s approval process.

“I need to see more than a removal of the item, I need to see who designed it, who photographed it, who approved it on all levels. Hell, I need to see the parent that let their child be used this way,” said one social media user.

Target released a statement on their Instagram on Aug. 24 about the incident.

“As a company, we know we got this wrong, and we are deeply sorry,” the statement said.

“We know this is especially hurtful for our Black guests, team members and partners. Removing the costume is an important first step, and we are looking closely at how this happened and what needs to change to ensure this won’t happen again.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top