‘Inexcusable!’: Black Women Told They Can’t Dine at Restaurant Because of Short Dresses While Others in Eye-Popping Attire Are Let in

Rosemary Harrison of Houston, Texas, was looking forward to celebrating a friend’s birthday at Cocody, an upscale French-inspired restaurant near the tony River Oaks neighborhood.

For the special girls’ night out, the group brought the glam, delivering some seriously sexy, sultry looks. However, before they could even set foot in the dining room, an employee said their reservation had been canceled, citing dress code violations.

Black Women Told They Can't Dine at Restaurant Because of Short Dresses While Others In Eye-Popping Attire Are Let In
Rosemary Harrison of Houston, Texas (Photo: Roszzemarie/Instagram)

In an Instagram Reel posted on April 1, Harrison claimed the restaurant gave an excuse that their dresses were too short and one woman had bare shoulders, but she believes there was something more sinister at play: racial discrimination.

‘Don’t Want to Die Today!’: Missouri Mom Taking Uber to Get Groceries, Ran Off Road and Ambushed By Gunmen, Then What Happens Next Only Deepens the Nightmare

The news of the cancellation came as a shock to the group because they saw non-Black women dressed similarly who weren’t turned away.

Harrison’s video shows a group dressed in equally eye-popping outfits — including miniskirts and bare shoulders — leaving Cocody after dinner. Meanwhile, Harrison and her friends were stranded outside, forced to take birthday photos on the patio. Though the women salvaged the night by heading to a nearby restaurant, the experience left a lingering bad taste in their mouths.

Harrison wrote in the video’s caption: “It is definitely okay for restaurants to have dress codes, however, make sure the dress code applies to everybody!”

Cocody details its dress code on its website, encouraging business casual and professional attire to promote a “sophisticated atmosphere.”  

“Athletic wear, streetwear, slippers, excessively revealing clothing, or exposed undergarments are not permitted,” it states.

Viewers flocked to the comments on Instagram to express their opinions on everything from “plunging necklines” and “see-through” fabric to fashion policing and racism.

“The issue is if you’re going to enforce your ‘policy,’ make sure it applies to EVERYONE. Let’s be honest here. The dresses the non-Black women had on were very much the same length as the women of color, as well as the shoulders being out,” noted one person.

Another chimed in: “They were policing those Black women’s bodies, and it is inexcusable discrimination. We should all be tired of white people telling us where to be, how to show up, where we can’t be… because of our literal bodies.”

One commenter acknowledged the double-standard but seemed resigned, “The rules for us in ‘their’ establishments have always been more stringent. It’s not right, but it is the world we live in.”

A few people believed their attire was “inappropriate,” quibbling about “tight” fits and showing too much.

But as one astute observer put it: “Race! It’s your race that’s showing.”

Cocody, which is Black-owned, had not responded to Harrison at press time.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top