‘A DEI Plant’: MAGA Supporters Go After Ketanji Brown Jackson After She Dissents Against SCOTUS Ruling to Strip Venezuelan Immigrants of Temporary Protection Status

This week, the Supreme Court lifted a federal judge’s order that blocked the Trump administration from ending temporary legal protections for nearly 350,000 Venezuelans in the U.S., breaking open an opportunity for the president to potentially deport them.

Reuters reported that the Justice Department requested the justices lift an order halting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s decision to revoke temporary protected status (TPS) granted to hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans in the country.

The status is conferred to foreign citizens who cannot safely return to their home countries due to war, natural disasters, or other “extraordinary” conditions, which also gives them access to work permits. Some TPS holders, including members of the National TPS Alliance advocacy group, said Venezuela remains an unsafe country.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson speaks at an event U.S. President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris hosted celebrating Jackson’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court on the South Lawn of the White House on April 08, 2022, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The May 19 unsigned decision noted that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson would have dissented from the high court’s order, but the justices’ actual vote was not announced.

After the decision started making news headlines, several people, including Trump loyalists, went after Jackson on social media, insulting her status as a justice and her appointment to the country’s highest court.

“Ketanji Brown Jackson is a DEI plant who is just an activist who should have never been on the Supreme Court,” another person wrote.

“…the extremely low I.Q. Ketanji Brown Jackson !!” someone else added.

“She’s totally unqualified to serve on the Supreme Court,” another person wrote of Jackson.

Others backed Jackson, denouncing claims that she is “unqualified” for her position.

“Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is one of the most qualified jurists on the Supreme Court a former public defender, federal judge, and Harvard Law graduate. Disagreeing with her legal interpretation doesn’t make her unqualified; it just means she’s willing to stand by the Constitution, even when it’s unpopular. A lone dissent doesn’t signal incompetence it often signals courage,” one person wrote on X.

“People are going to hate hearing this, but Ketanji Brown Jackson is the most effective SC justice on the court,” someone else added. “She plays to win for her team while everyone else around her doesn’t understand how the game is even played.”

In March, Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edward Chen said Noem’s actions threatened to “inflict irreparable harm on hundreds of thousands of persons whose lives, families, and livelihoods will be severely disrupted, cost the United States billions in economic activity, and injure public health and safety in communities throughout the United States.”

The Trump administration appealed the ruling, but an appeals court declined to pause Chen’s order, prompting the administration to take the matter up with the Supreme Court.

Even though the Supreme Court lifted the order, justices left migrants the opportunity to challenge the decision if the administration attempts to cancel work permits or other TPS-related documents that are set to expire in October 2026, which marks the end of the TPS period as established by former President Joe Biden.

The Department of Homeland Security has reported that 348,202 Venezuelans were registered under Biden’s 2023 TPS designation.

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Latest from Atlanta Black Star

Back to top