‘Deeply Troubling’: NYPD Issues Public Apology Months After Deleting Tweet Falsely Accusing Black Teen of Mass Shooting, Leaving Him and Family to Deal with Death Threats

An NYPD social media post wrongly pinned a mass shooting at a parade in Brooklyn last year on a Black 15-year-old boy resulting in a dramatic personal upheaval for the teen and his family.

According to The Associated Press, more than two weeks after a shooting at New York City’s West Indian American Day Parade, police investigators posted a surveillance image of 15-year-old Camden Lee on their social media accounts and labeled him a shooting suspect.

NYPD wrongly accuses Black teen of murder and tries to apologize quietly. (Credit: NYPD/AP News Twitter Screenshot)

But Lee was merely an innocent spectator of the event.

It would take another five months for the police department to make a public apology and admit the wrongdoing after quietly meeting with Lee’s family.

NYPD said the image circulated on social media “mistakenly” stated that Lee was “wanted for the fatal shooting,” read a statement sent to news outlet on Sunday, including The Associated Press.

“The NYPD should have immediately corrected this misstatement,” added the department’s new chief spokesperson, Delaney Kempner. “We apologize for the error and will continue to seek justice for the victims of this shooting.”

The shooting happened on Sept. 2, 2024. Camden Lee left football practice with a teammate around 1 p.m. that day and decided to stop by the Labor Day weekend celebration that quickly devolved into chaos when someone opened fire into the crowd.

A bullet grazed the shoulder of Lee’s friend, but Lee walked away unharmed.

Then, on Sept. 19, NYPD began circulating Lee’s image and stating that he “discharged a firearm” at the parade.

“I see the NYPD logo. I see me. I see ‘suspect wanted for murder,’” Lee told AP. “I couldn’t believe what was happening. Then everything went blurry.”

Lee’s mother immediately contacted an attorney who reached out to police the same day Lee’s photo was posted in an effort to meet with investigators and clear the teen’s name.

Police instructed the lawyer to bring Lee to Brooklyn’s 77th police precinct the following week where detectives privately met with Lee’s attorney and confirmed that the 15-year-old was not a suspect.

“They conceded they got it wrong,” attorney Kenneth Montgomery said. “But these officers were so cavalier about it. It was like they were playing a game with a kid’s life.”

Investigators discreetly removed Lee’s photo from their social accounts and contacted local reporters through texts, urging them and their outlets not to use the image.

However, because detectives never issued a public statement coming clean about the blunder, the teen and his family had to navigate the fallout on their own.

“I used to have a lot of trust in the NYPD and how they do things,” said Lee’s mother, Chee Chee Brock, whose older son recently joined the department. “But I raised my kids to admit when they made a mistake. If you can blame an innocent kid for murder, what else can you get away with?”

As Lee’s photo continued to circulate on the internet, online sleuths tracked down his social media accounts and sent him a slew of death threats.

The day after the shooting, police said that the violence was gang-related and described the suspect as a slim man in his 20s who wore a paint-stained brown shirt and bandana. The photo police posted showed Lee wearing neither of these clothing items.

Lee’s mother feared possible gang retaliation and decided to move her son and two daughters to a relative’s home outside of Brooklyn, forcing Lee to miss several weeks of school, which caused his grades to suffer.

When they finally moved back, Lee was forbidden to go out in public by himself.

“As a mom, the No. 1 thing I’m scared of is losing my kids to the streets or the jail system,” said. “So he doesn’t have freedom now. When he goes to the corner store, I time him.”

Months later the family can breathe a sigh of relief but are not completely satisfied with the public apology, calling it “superficial.”

It’s unclear why police initially identified Lee as a suspect. Deputy Commissioner for Public Information Delaney Kempner, a newly-appointed spokesperson, told AP she would look into the matter but did not elaborate further.

In December 2024, investigators increased the reward for information leading to the shooting suspect to $10,000. Even though police are no longer circulating Lee’s photo, the teen and his family are still pleading with them to publicly address their mistake.

“It takes me to a dark place,” Lee said. “I don’t feel like myself anymore. I don’t have the opportunity to explain my side of the story. Everyone is so fixed on this one image of me: murderer.”

The family is now weighing the possibility of taking legal action against the NYPD.

“There’s tremendous pressure on the NYPD to serve up results in a high-profile shooting like this,” said Wylie Stecklow, a civil rights attorney representing the family. “The fact that they’ve failed to explain how this mistake was made, and how they’ll avoid it in the future, is deeply troubling.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top