‘Doesn’t Even Bother Hiding He’s a Bought and Paid for Justice’: Clarence Thomas Swears In Kristi Noem at Home After VP Vance Walks Out, Sparking Outrage Over Supreme Court’s Trump Ties

Kristi Noem, the nation’s new Secretary of Homeland Security, was running so late for her own swearing-in that Vice President J.D. Vance, who was to administer the oath of office, bailed after waiting 40 minutes.

No problem. The White House merely called on its favorite Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas, to administer the oath. Which he did, at his home.

It’s not illegal, experts say, but certainly unusual for one Supreme Court justice to handle so many swearings-in. Traditionally, the vice president has handled those duties but, as CNN’s Dana Bash reports, Thomas is “emerging as the go-to Justice to swear in Donald Trump’s cabinet, overseeing ceremonies at the Supreme Court, at the White House, even at his own home.”

It’s not the violation of tradition that many critics find concerning but rather the closeness between the Supreme Court’s most conservative justice, his wife and the Trump White House.

“You have to understand that Clarence Thomas was the one swearing his loyalty,” said one commenter to the article appearing on Mediaite.

Added another, “They want the DEI Justice Clarence Thomas to swear them in? I thought these Republicans were against DEI?”

Thomas has overseen five swearing-in ceremonies thus far: Attorney General Pam Bondi, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner, Veterans Affairs Administrator Doug Collings, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Noem.

CNN Supreme Court analyst Joan Biskupic said Trump himself had requested Thomas to conduct the ceremonies. Ginny Thomas, the longest-serving justice’s wife, is one of the president’s most vocal supporters.

“During the first administration, she was regularly in contact with top White House officials,” Biskupic reported. “And then we know in 2020, when Donald Trump lost that election to Joe Biden, she was somebody imploring Mark Meadows, then the chief of staff, to keep fighting, keep fighting, keep fighting.”

“And the January 6 committee found all sorts of emails that she had sent,” she continued. “So that can give you a context of these two especially, you know, Justice Thomas has been, of all the nine justices, the one most willing to sort of interact with the Trump administration.”

Ginny Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, is more than just a Trump fangirl. She was speculated to be one of the six unnamed co-conspirators cited in the federal indictment of Trump by former Special Counsel Jack Smith during his investigation of efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 election.

She is alleged to have sent emails to dozens of Arizona election officials and lawmakers telling them it was their “constitutional duty” to install a “clean slate of electors” willing to declare Trump the winner in that state in 2020.

Thomas has been the focus of scrutiny because of conversations she had with then White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in the weeks following the 2020 election in which she encouraged him to continue efforts to overturn the results.

Her conversations with Meadows were often dire, imploring the former chief of staff in one message to “help This Great President stand firm Mark!!! … You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.”

In another text she urged him to “release the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down.”

Clarence Thomas, meanwhile, was pilloried for allowing himself to be used by Trump. The swearings-in reveal “Thomas doesn’t even bother hiding he’s a bought and paid for justice,” said one commenter.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top