House Democrats Seek to Strip Secret Service Protection from Trump as Legal Experts Think He’ll Ask for Home Confinement If Convicted 

House Democrats proposed a bill that aims to revoke Secret Service protection from Donald Trump if he’s convicted in any of his four felony criminal trials as lawmakers sought a preemptive strategy that would prevent any potential legal complications and clear the way for the first former president in history to serve jail time.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, the Mississippi Democrat who led the Jan. 6 select committee that recommended federal election fraud charges against Trump in 2022, introduced the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act, which would effectively remove lifelong Secret Service protection from any former president if they are convicted of a felony and sentenced to a year or more in prison.

“Unfortunately, current law doesn’t anticipate how Secret Service protection would impact the felony prison sentence of a protectee — even a former President,” Thompson said in a statement on April 19.

House Democrats Seek to Strip Secret Service Protection from Trump as Legal Experts Think He'll Ask for Home Confinement If Convicted 
Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to guest at a campaign event on December 19, 2023 in Waterloo, Iowa. Iowa Republicans will be the first to select their party’s nomination for the 2024 presidential race, when they go to caucus on January 15, 2024. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality. Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment — and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”

The legislative action targets the Secret Service protections that have led some legal experts to believe that if Trump is convicted, he would probably be confined to his home instead of going to prison because he has constant Secret Service protection.

“This bill would remove the potential for conflicting lines of authority within prisons and allow judges to weigh the sentencing of individuals without having to factor in the logistical concerns of convicts with Secret Service protection,” Thompson’s aides explained in an addendum to the bill.

Secret Service protection goes far beyond current and former presidents as security details are also assigned to safeguard prominent lawmakers and administrative officials, as well as their immediate family members.

Trump is the only person receiving Secret Service protection who is facing 88 felony charges across four separate state and federal cases, including 34 counts in the hush money indictment, which accuses Trump of using campaign funds to cover up an alleged sexual affair with former adult film star Stormy Daniels.

The case claims that Trump unlawfully altered business records while reimbursing his ex-lawyer, Michael Cohen, for a payment to Daniels, which concealed the scandalous affair from voters and helped seal Trump’s victory in 2016. 

It’s uncertain if any of the other criminal cases will go to trial before November as Trump was the first president in history to face criminal indictment, accused of state and federal election fraud and of illegal retention of classified documents after leaving office.

Thompson said the legislation will not present any new issues with applying the law retroactively, known as ex post facto concerns. He cited previous legal cases that say the government can remove such benefits as long as the change isn’t meant to be unlawfully punitive.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top