‘Both Illegal and Unethical’: Two Former Prosecutors Are on Trial After Being Accused of Lying In Conviction of Now-Exonerated Man Who Wrongfully Spent 36 Years In Prison for Cop Killing

Two ex-prosecutors charged for their alleged role in lying in the case of a man who wrongfully ended up spending more than three decades in prison are now on trial.

The former Cook County assistant state attorneys are in hot water after they were accused of misconduct in the case of Jackie Wilson. Nick Trutenko faces charges, including obstruction of justice and perjury, and his co-defendant Andrew Horvat was charged with official misconduct, ABC 7 reported. 

The trial of former prosecutors Nick Trutenko and Andrew Horvat began this week. They are facing charges in connection to the prosecution of exonerated man Jackie Wilson.(YouTube screenshot/ABC 7 Chicago)

Wilson was exonerated in 2020. He endured 36 years behind bars for killing two Chicago cops — a crime he reportedly did not commit, but his now-deceased brother did. Wilson and his brother, Andrew, were arrested in February 1982 concerning the deaths of officers William Fahey and Robert O’Brien. They died from gunshot wounds. 

Trending Today:

When Lt. Jon Burge and his team interrogated the duo, they were tortured and ultimately forced into making false confessions after getting brutally beaten, according to a post from the National Registry of Exonerations. They were allegedly punched and kicked and received electric shocks. At one point, Andrew was burned after being tied to a radiator.

According to reports, Wilson’s first conviction was tossed out on an appeal. When he was retried in 1989, he was cleared of Fahey’s death but convicted for O’Brien’s. Wilson’s defense team heavily argued that Burge’s team pressured him to confess, resulting in his conviction being overturned again in 2018, as reported by The Associated Press. 

“They beat me over the head with a dictionary, stuck a gun in my mouth. Then they did the electric shock,” Wilson recalled his experience at the time, per the outlet. “That came after this guy played Russian roulette with a gun in my mouth.”

Two years later, during Wilson’s third trial, it was revealed that Trutenko had a close relationship with a significant witness in his second trial. 

Trutenko, the head prosecutor during the 1989 trial, admitted to being the godfather to one of the children of witness William Coleman, per Fox 32 Chicago. He is accused of not telling his colleagues about the connection, and special prosecutors decided to dismiss the charges.

Horvat reportedly was charged for his actions while he was representing Trutenko when he took the stand, according to reports.

“Literally, right before he took the stand, Andrew Horvat went to the Special Prosecutor Larry Rosen and said, ‘Do not ask Nick Trutenko about his relationship with William Coleman.’ He said there was nothing illegal or unethical, but it was just weird [and] that’s not true — it was both illegal and unethical,” special prosecutor Lawrence Oliver II told ABC 7 earlier this year. 

Trutenko and Horvat’s trial began this week but will be stalled for a few weeks because of scheduling. 

Read the original story here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top