‘This Is Discouraging’: International Swimming Federation Rules Athletes Can’t Wear Swim Caps Created for Natural Hair In Upcoming Olympic Competition

A Black-owned company specializing in making swim gear, specifically swim caps for women with natural hair, was denied certification into the Tokyo Olympics, leaving many people on social media to believe that the decision was rooted in racism. 

According to a report published by Metro on Wednesday, June 30, the International Swimming Federation (FINA) rejected an application from a brand called Soul Cap, established in 2017. FINA claims, given the organization’s “best knowledge, the athletes competing at the International events never used, neither require to use, caps of such size and configuration.” They further stated that the caps don’t follow “the natural form of the head.”

Following the announcement, Soul Cap released “a message from our founders,” Michael Chapman and Toks Ahmed, on their official Instagram account explaining that they had hoped to provide a solution at the Olympics for athletes with natural hair so that “swimmers at any level don’t have to choose between the sport they love and their hair.”

International Swimming Federation rules athletes can’t wear swim caps created by Black owned company Soul Cap, in upcoming Olympic competition. @soulcapofficial/Instagram

The statement stressed the importance of inclusivity in sports, noting that FINA’s decision to dismiss their application “could discourage many younger athletes from pursuing the sport as they progress through local, county and national competitive swimming.”

“We feel there’s always room for improvement, but there’s only so much grassroots and small brands can do — we need the top to be receptive to positive change. A huge thanks to all who have supported us and our work so far. We don’t see this as a setback but a chance to open up a dialogue to make a bigger difference.💧,” the statement concluded. 

News of the brand’s rejection from the competition angered many people online, including one Twitter user who wrote, “Black women go thru life dealing w/ sexism/racism. Told our natural hair is untamed/ugly. We’ve been made to feel we have to adopt a different standard. Shame on @fina1908 for not recognizing diversity & inclusion. #FreshEmpowersWomen  #RaiseAFist.”

“This is discouraging,” expressed another person. “Fina’s statement shows they have zero understanding of Black hair. This is a frustration for WOC and we have never had an option designed for us.” 

A third commented, “Right. This is horrifying. @soulcapofficial did the right thing. The made inclusive swimwear for natural hair and the @Olympics has the audacity to say ‘elite athletes’ do not require this? Who are these ‘elite athletes’ they speak of? What do they look like?”

According to the 2020 FINA Olympic rule book, it’s “permissible to wear two swim caps.” In addition, manufacturers of new swimwear and caps that include “a new design, construction, or material” must “submit the swimwear to FINA to obtain its approval” before use in competitions.

In a statement to Insider, Chapman and Ahmed expressed that “this isn’t just about the Olympics.” Ahmed continued, “This is also about the lower leagues of competition swimming — for swimmers at an age where feeling included is so pivotal in their development and goals. We don’t see this rejection as a setback, but rather a chance to open up an important dialogue and make a bigger difference.”

The business partners say they have seen an outpouring of support since the ruling and hope that their story “highlights the lack of diversity in aquatics and drives long-term change in sporting rules.”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top