Federal Judge Sides With White Farmer Who Said Debt Relief Package for Black Farmers Is Unfair, Temporarily Halts Stimulus Package

A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a stimulus package that forgives agricultural debts to Black farmers and other farmers of color.

U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard issued a preliminary injunction, halting a part of the loan forgiveness payments and blocking the $4 billion aid package, saying the program’s “rigid, categorical, race-based qualification for relief is the antithesis of flexibility.”

Scott Wynn, a white farmer from Florida, challenged President Joe Biden’s debt relief program in May, saying he faced financial hardship during the pandemic and that the program discriminated against him on the basis of race.

Howard ruled Monday that Wynn had established a “strong likelihood” that the program is a violation of his right to equal protection under the law.

According to Howard, Wynn will likely be successful in demonstrating that the portion of the American Rescue Plan Act that states that debt relief will be provided to “socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers” is unconstitutional.

Howard wrote in her Middle District Court of Florida decision, “Congress also must heed its obligation to do away with governmentally imposed discrimination based on race.” She added that “it appears that in adopting Section 1005’s strict race-based debt relief remedy Congress moved with great speed to address the history of discrimination, but did not move with great care.”

U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard issued a preliminary injunction halting a part of the loan forgiveness payments and blocking the $4 billion aid package bill to Black farmers. (Photo: FloridaBar.org)

The judge said the U.S. Agriculture Department can continue to move forward with preparing the debt relief program in advance of a ruling on its constitutionality.

The USDA had planned to begin distributing payments to disadvantaged farmers in June for debt relief, grants, training and education.

Some Black agricultural groups had spoken about the package as a form of reparations for Black farmers, who have long since faced federal discrimination, and are disproportionately likely to be disadvantaged.

Over the past century, Black farmers have lost 12 million acres of farmland due to a combination of racism, and discriminatory practices and policies on the part of the government.

White farmers collected nearly 97% of the $9.2 billion in USDA pandemic payments from May through October 2020, according to the Environmental Working Group. On average, white farmers received $3,398 while Black farmers averaged $422.

A Wisconsin judge previously blocked the program following a case brought by a white farmer in the state.

In response to the judge’s ruling, the USDA said it would defend the program. “USDA will continue to forcefully defend our ability to carry out this act of Congress and deliver debt relief to socially disadvantaged borrowers,” a department spokesperson said in an email to Politico. “When the temporary order is lifted, USDA will be prepared to provide the debt relief authorized by Congress.”

Howard requested Wynn’s lawyers and the Justice Department to move quickly so that a more permanent ruling can be reached, and asked that they submit to her a schedule no later than June 29.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top