Human Rights Board Orders Halifax Police to Pay Black Man $15K After Following Him Into Work Building to Issue Jaywalking Ticket

An independent human rights board recently found that a Black Canadian man was racially profiled in 2017 when he was first detained on the street by two officers, allowed to go, and minutes later followed back to his office to confront him again and issue him a ticket — for jaywalking. The board ordered the Halifax Regional Police to pay the Black man, Gyasi Symonds, more than $15,000 and formally apologize, but Symonds says the cops are getting off with “a slap on the wrist.”

Board Chair Benjamin Perryman made the announcement on Wednesday, May 5. He concluded that when Symonds was stopped by two Halifax Regional Police constables and later given a $410 ticket, it was based on his race.

Photo provided by Gyasi Symonds

In his ruling, Perryman described the encounter between Symonds and constables Paul Cadieux and Steve Logan that began when Symonds was seen crossing Gottingen Street on Jan. 24, 2017, to get coffee. The report read that the pair stopped the man as he headed for the Nook Espresso Bar across the street from his office without using a crosswalk at the corner. He was warned about jaywalking and was let go, an encounter the chairman said was “brief and cordial,” but Symonds says the detention lasted about 15 minutes.

However, it’s what took place next that’s a matter of contention, especially after Symonds told the board that he crossed at the intersection upon returning to his office. The constables claimed not only did he jaywalk once again, but he didn’t yield to a bus.

What’s not in dispute is what happened during the second encounter. Symonds had been back in his office with his coffee when the front desk called him to say two cops were in the lobby seeking “a Black man in a toque,” as he told CBC program “As It Happens” last week.

CBC described how the second interaction played out:

They asked for his ID and threatened to arrest him, he said.

“The whole demeanour and vibe of the situation was hostile,” he said. “I was humiliated and I was terrified. I thought they were going to try to arrest me, and they were completely ready to do so. One had his hand on his gun.”

Symonds’ story was corroborated by Carolyn Brodie, the commissionaire working on the front desk of the lobby, who testified on his behalf in front of the human rights board of inquiry. 

“She stated that she was worried the police were going to hurt Mr. Symonds, and that she was in shock by what she considered to be their disproportionate response,” the ruling notes.

“She characterized Const. Cadieux’s demeanour as not in control, and stated that he ‘lost it’ in response to Mr. Symonds speaking. She said the incident left her feeling shaken.”

Under the province’s Motor Vehicle Act, it’s illegal for someone to cross a road at a place where there’s not a regular crossing for pedestrians and not “yield the right of way to vehicles on the roadway.” Perryman found that it was “more likely than not” that Symonds jaywalked on his return trip but concluded that the officers’ decision to wait and observe the man was based on his race.

Perryman declared that Symonds should not have been ticketed and ordered that Halifax Regional Police pay him $15,232 (about $12,568 in U.S. currency) general damages and compensation for “injury to his dignity, feelings, and self-respect.”

Symonds told CBC that’s not sufficient.

“I’m happy that the hearing worked out in my favor, but I don’t feel like it sent the message,” Symonds said in his CBC interview. “These decisions are supposed to be made in a way where it deters people from wanting to behave that way again. And, you know, it was such a mild decision that it’s almost worthwhile to keep discriminating if you can maintain your job and maintain your pension and you only have to take a course and apologize.”

Board chairman Perryman’s statement stopped short of finding actual malice on the part of the constables.

“I do not go so far as to find that the Halifax Regional Police officers constructed their evidence. … However, on the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that there was a good basis for issuing such a ticket, and there was certainly no basis whatsoever to be targeting the complainant in the first place,” Perryman wrote. “It subjected the complainant to policing that was different from other Nova Scotians going about their day. It was disproportionate to the circumstances of an individual crossing in the middle of the road to get a coffee and receiving informal education about jaywalking,” he concluded.

He also found that training for the officers was inadequate and contributed to their discriminatory behavior. He suggested that all new police hires “successfully complete training in legitimate and bias-free policing before they commence active duty, and all current police officers should be required to retake and successfully complete such training periodically.” 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top