Republican Congressman Gaetz Gets Schooled After Questioning Why Howard University Is Allotted $13M in $2 Trillion COVID-19 Bill

Florida congressman Matt Gaetz got a much-needed lesson from internet critics this week after he criticized a provision in the coronavirus stimulus bill passed by the Senate that gave $13 million to Howard University.

The historically Black institution, located in Washington, D.C., is home to a state-of-the-art medical facility and Level 1 trauma center that’s now being used as a COVID-19 treatment facility. Yet Gaetz seems to have missed the memo.

Sen. Kamala Harris and Rep. Matt Gaetz
Sen. Kamala Harris (left) was among those who criticized Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz for his comments questioning the emergency funding appropriated for Howard University, an HBCU. (Photos: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty, Pool/Getty Images)

“$13,000,000 in taxpayer funds could be going to families across the nation struggling to put food on the table in the midst of COVID-19,” he wrote in a tweet Wednesday, accompanied by screenshots of the provision detailed in the coronavirus relief measure.

“Instead, it’s going to Howard University,” Gaetz continued. “Education is important- but a $13 million check to Howard does not belong in COVID-19 relief.”

Backlash was swift, with many criticizing the Republican representative for being so oblivious to a major hospital that’s just a few blocks from his Washington office. Others pointed out that the university is federally chartered, so it’s appropriate that it would receive emergency funding.

“How embarrassing is it that @mattgaetz is a U.S. Congressman and doesn’t understand that Howard University is federally chartered, which explains why it has specifically appropriated funds in the bill,” a Twitter user wrote, adding: “HU is a medical school and hospital with class-1 trauma facilities.”

Adam Serwer, a staff writer for The Atlantic, echoed these facts, adding: “Howard University Hospital is federally funded and also one of DC’s designated coronavirus treatment centers. White supremacy is a suicide pact.”

“Howard University is home to a medical school and a hospital, Rep. Gas Mask,” journalist and author Goldie Taylor chimed in, referring to the time the congressman sported a gas mask during a House floor vote on funding for the public health crisis earlier this month.

Gaetz’s ill-informed remarks also drew a rebuke from California Senator and Howard alum Kamala Harris, who pressed the congressman on why he was so perturbed over the funding.

“The [stimulus] bill provides $30 billion to protect students and help schools, colleges and universities combat the coronavirus. This is $13 million,” she wrote.

In a follow-up tweet, she added: “$13 million = .04% of $30 billion. Why do you take issue with money going to Howard, Congressman?”

The discussion raged on well into Wednesday night, with “Howard University” becoming a top trending topic on Twitter.

Gaetz has defended his remarks despite the controversy, arguing he was only playing the “earmark card” and had criticized several other provisions, including union giveaways and funding for migrants and refugees.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top