Watch: Bystanders Do Nothing as Black Blind Student Is Harassed, Forcefully Dragged from Debate Hall at Oxford Union Event

One of Oxford University’s most prestigious societies is facing scrutiny after a Black blind student was allegedly “dragged by his feet” from a debate hall last week in a “disgraceful” incident caught on video.

Ebenezer Azamati, a Ph.D. student from Ghana, was attending a debate held by the Oxford Union, revered as the “world’s most prestigious speaker and debating society,” Saturday when he was manhandled and forcefully ejected from the event, The Sunday Times reported.

The 25-year-old, who’s studying international relations at the British university, had arrived early to the debate to save himself a seat, as he was unsure if there would be special provisions for disabled persons. He placed a book down to reserve his spot, then left for dinner.

When Azamati returned for the event, he was denied entry but eventually made his way into the audience to take his seat. Seconds later, witnesses said security arrived and dragged the young man from the room, despite his efforts to resist being strong-armed.

In the minute-long clip, Azamati is seen in a tense back-and-forth with the guards before they begin grabbing for his arms.

“The whole ordeal looked humiliating and traumatizing,” one student told The Oxford student, which first reported the incident. “The force used was objectively disproportionate — at one point he was being dragged off the bench by his feet while audience members merely looked on.”

Student Henry Hatwell testified during an appeal hearing Saturday, describing how the guards rushed in “thirty seconds after [Azamati] sat down.”

Ebenezer Azamati

Ebenezer Azamati, 25, said his forceful removal from an Oxford Union event
Saturday made him feel “unwelcome” at the university. (Photo: YouTube / video screenshot)

“Five seconds afterwards, he started touching Azamati, who was holding on to the bench,”Hatwell added. ““Thirty seconds later, they were dragging him by his ankles.”

The ordeal was decried by the Oxford University Africa Society (OUAS), who argued Azamati had been subjected to “violent, unjust, inhumane, and shameful treatment” while trying to reenter the debate hall. The group has since launched a petition calling for the ouster of Oxford Union president Brendan McGrath, who alleged during a disciplinary hearing that Azamati had behaved violently/aggressively.

At that same meeting, the Ph.D. student said his forced removal left him feeling “unwelcome” at Oxford and Britain as a whole.

“I felt that I was treated as not being human enough to deserve justice and fair treatment,” Azamati added.

According to The Independent, McGrath later withdrew his complaint alleging violent misconduct by Azamati following Saturday’s hearing and apologized “unreservedly” for the pain and embarrassment the incident had caused.

“We’ve apologised unreservedly to Mr. Azamati for the distress and any reputational damage for which the publication of the incident may have caused,” the union said in a statement, adding that it’s currently in talks with the postgraduate student to resolve the “structural issues raised.”

“We do not wish to prejudice those discussions with further comment at this time,” it concluded.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top