Hollywood Exec Claims Julia Roberts Could Reasonably Play Harriet Tubman Because ‘It Was So Long Ago’

Social media has erupted over a newly unveiled tidbit disclosed by the screenwriter of the recently-opened film “Harriet.” According to Gregory Allen Howard, a studio executive suggested in 1994 that the Black enslaved abolitionist Harriet Tubman be portrayed on-screen by “The Pelican Brief” star Julia Roberts.

“When I got in the business, I wanted to tell these historical stories by turning them into entertainment. I didn’t want to give history lessons,” writer/producer Howard said in a Nov. 1 Q&A for the film’s distributor Focus Features. “I wanted to turn Harriet Tubman’s life, which I’d studied in college, into an action-adventure movie. The climate in Hollywood, however, was very different back then. I was told how one studio head said in a meeting, ‘This script is fantastic. Let’s get Julia Roberts to play Harriet Tubman.’ When someone pointed out that Roberts couldn’t be Harriet, the executive responded, ‘It was so long ago. No one is going to know the difference.'”

In an essay for the Los Angeles Times published on Tuesday morning, Howard expounded further that it was “a single black person in that studio meeting 25 years ago” to inform the former president of a studio sublabel “that Harriet Tubman was a black woman. The president replied, ‘That was so long ago. No one will know that.’”

British actress Cynthia Erivo ultimately wound up starring as Tubman in the drama released in theaters on Nov. 1.

But Howard’s revelation spurred a fierce reaction online as movie-goers tried to wrap their heads around the matter.

“Take several seats!!!!! TF is wrong with Hollywood?? Oh yea NVM 😒”

“What?? 🥴 Is that screenwriter on crack or something? 🤦🏼‍♀️”

“That’s disrespectful to our history”

“That’s what wrong with society ..seriously ..Gabriele Union will do a great job , Gazelle Beauvais too . Give them a chance ..jeez”

harriet tubman
Julia Roberts (left) and Harriet Tubman. (Photos: Kevin Winter/Getty Images for WarnerMedia, MPI/Getty Images)

It’s not clear how the studio exec would have wanted Roberts, who has not commented publicly on Howard’s anecdote, to pull off the performance. But Hollywood has made controversy-inducing casting choices before.

In 2013, reports emerged that Zoe Saldana was tapped to portray legendary singer and activist Nina Simone. Saldana, an Afro-Latina actress hailing from the Dominican Republic, was criticized for taking on the role as a light-skinned woman with a small nose and average-sized lips. Simone, meanwhile, had characteristically Afro-centric features, including a wide-set nose and full lips. She was also dark-skinned. The backlash over Saldana’s casting was so severe that a petition was launched for her role to be re-cast.

However, the actress defended her part in the film, saying to Glam Belleza “I do wish that people made their own judgment after they watch the movie because right now, it isn’t even edited yet, and there’s been so much uproar. … But the one thing that we all have in common is an unconditional love and admiration and respect for Nina Simone. Something that’s done out of love, in my mind, can’t be right or wrong.”

The film went on to be completed and released in 2016 with Saldana using prosthetics and makeup to make her performance complete.

Gregory Allen Howard at the premiere of Focus Features’ “Harriet” at The Orpheum Theatre on Oct. 29, 2019, in Los Angeles. (Photo: Leon Bennett/WireImage)

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top