White Texas Attorney Resigns After Using N-Word on College Panel but Censoring Other Hate Speech Examples

A white University of North Texas attorney resigned the day after students held her to task for saying n—-r during a panel discussion on hate speech but censoring herself when referring to the f-word.

Caitlin Sewell started the controversial “When Hate Comes to Campus” panel by saying a lot of people say offensive things in the lecture because “it’s impossible to talk about (the) First Amendment without saying horrible things.”

“‘You’re just a dumb n—-r and I hate you,'” Sewell said. “That alone, that’s protected speech.”

The attorney then censored herself four times when referencing a hypothetical situation in which someone walked into the dean of students’ office screaming obscenities.

“‘F this place. F all of you. You know. Y’all are all f-ing stupid,'” she said in the example.

She used the acronym again to explain that an offender might think the First Amendment protects the speech.

“‘No I can tell them all to f off anytime I want,'” Sewell said.

At that point, chuckles and whispers could be heard in a recording of the speech student JC Patino shared Thursday on Twitter.

Sewell went on to further explain which language was protected by the First Amendment until someone shouted a question:

“Excuse me, but why did you censor the f-word but not the n-word?”

Applause followed.

“I apologize. I didn’t think anything about that,” Sewell said.

The explanation appeared to do little to ease her audience’s concerns.

“No no, you know that that word is offensive,” another person could be heard saying in the recording.

Sewell apologized again and said she “didn’t mean anything by that.”

“You know that that word comes with a history of hurt,” someone shouted at the woman. “It was unnecessary. It was cruel.

“It was unnecessary, and it was cruel, and you know that.”

Sewell continued explaining.

“I wish I had censored that word. It came out without thought,” she said.

The attorney started to apologize again, but the crowd interrupted her with protests and questions.

“How often do you say it for it to just roll of your tongue,” one woman asked, earning her praise from the crowd.

“I literally have never said that word in a public setting before,” Sewell said.

The recording ended, but the discussion didn’t.

Yolian Ogbu, the university’s Student Government Association president, was shown holding back tears in a photo Patino tweeted.

Caitlin Sewell at podium and Yolian Ogbu with welling tears
Former University of North Texas attorney Caitlin Sewell (left) faced heavy scrutiny after saying the n-word but censoring herself with the f-word in a hate speech discussion Nov. 7. University Student Government Association President Yolian Ogbu (right) spoke out. (Photos: Screenshots from @JCestahablando / Twitter)

When she spoke in another recording Patino tweeted, her voice cracked.

“I’ve kind of been shaking for awhile,” she said. “So it’s really tough because…”

The university’s President Neal Smatresk and the system Chancellor Lesa Roe announced Sewell had resigned Nov. 8 in a joint statement released later that day on the university website.

In the statement, the school leaders said they “approach the situation with regret and determination.”

“We strongly believe in a culture that embraces, and vehemently defends, inclusion,” Smatresk and Roe said. “While Ms. Sewell was trying to make a point about First Amendment speech, the references used are never condoned in our community, which prides itself on our diversity and caring nature.”

The university leaders also mentioned plans to engage students and campus leaders in discussion “regarding ways we can continue to foster a culture of diversity.”

“In the meantime, UNT counseling resources are available for all students, faculty, and staff,” Smatresk and Roe said.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top